日期:2026/01/13   IAE 

Policy Indicators & Evaluation Metrics

Life Value Index (LVI)

Measuring Life-Centered Economic Governance in the AI Era

Prepared for
United Nations System – Policy Design, Monitoring & Evaluation

Author
Frank Chen (陳俊吉)
Founder, Global Charity Economicism
GCWPA × NATS Think Tank | IAE Global  

本文件定位為 UN Policy White Paper 的方法論與評估工具章(Methodology & Metrics Chapter / Annex),可供 UNDP / DESA / WHO / ECOSOC / UNGA 於政策設計、監測與跨國比較時使用。

文本遵循 UN 指標設計原則
可量化|可比較|可治理|避免價值裁判語言|可與 SDGs 並行使用

  • ✔ UN-compatible indicator framework

  • ✔ SDG-aligned, non-ideological

  • ✔ Scalable and adaptable

  • ✔ Ready for annex or methodology chapter inclusion


1. Purpose of the Life Value Index (LVI)

The Life Value Index (LVI) is designed to support governments and international organizations in:

  • Assessing whether economic and social systems preserve or erode life value

  • Identifying price-, policy-, or system-induced delays in access to life-critical services

  • Complementing existing SDG indicators with a life-centered evaluative lens

The LVI does not replace SDG indicators, but functions as a cross-cutting integrative metric.


2. Conceptual Definition

For measurement purposes, Life Value (LV) is defined as:

The immediately accessible capacity of individuals and societies to sustain life, health, dignity, safety, and long-term continuity.

Accordingly, the LVI focuses on accessibility, timeliness, and preventive capacity, rather than output volume alone.


3. Structure of the Life Value Index

The LVI is composed of five core sub-indices, each reflecting a critical dimension of life value preservation.

Overview of LVI Structure

Sub-Index Dimension Core Question
LVI-1 Life Accessibility Can life-critical services be accessed without delay?
LVI-2 Life Delay Risk Are price or systems causing life value deferral?
LVI-3 Preventive Capacity Is the system preventive or reactive?
LVI-4 Life Inequality Gap Are life value outcomes equitably distributed?
LVI-5 Life Sustainability Are life-preserving outcomes fiscally and ecologically sustainable?

4. Sub-Index Definitions and Core Indicators

LVI-1|Life Accessibility Index

Objective
Measure the degree to which populations can immediately access life-critical services.

Key Indicators (illustrative)

  • Population covered by essential health services (%)

  • Average waiting time for primary healthcare

  • Access to clean water, sanitation, and basic energy (%)

  • Geographic accessibility (travel time to services)

Policy Interpretation
High LVI-1 = Life is not delayed by design.


LVI-2|Life Delay Risk Index

Objective
Identify structural risks that delay life value realization.

Key Indicators

  • Out-of-pocket expenditure as % of total health spending

  • Income-based service access disparities

  • Deferred or forgone care due to cost (%)

  • Price barriers in education and health

Policy Interpretation
High LVI-2 = Economic structures are deferring life.


LVI-3|Preventive Capacity Index

Objective
Assess whether systems prevent life value loss before it occurs.

Key Indicators

  • Preventive healthcare expenditure (% of total health spending)

  • Vaccination and early screening coverage

  • Environmental risk prevention measures

  • Investment in early childhood development

Policy Interpretation
High LVI-3 = Life value is preserved upstream.


LVI-4|Life Inequality Gap Index

Objective
Measure disparities in life value outcomes across groups.

Key Indicators

  • Gap in life expectancy by income / region / gender

  • Preventable mortality differentials

  • Education completion gaps

  • Access disparities in essential services

Policy Interpretation
High LVI-4 = Life value distribution is uneven.


LVI-5|Life Sustainability Index

Objective
Evaluate whether life value preservation is fiscally and ecologically sustainable.

Key Indicators

  • Long-term public health expenditure growth

  • Emergency vs. preventive spending ratio

  • Environmental health indicators linked to mortality

  • Intergenerational fiscal exposure

Policy Interpretation
High LVI-5 = Life value gains are durable.


5. Composite LVI Scoring (Illustrative Method)

The LVI can be calculated as a weighted composite index:

 

 

LVI=w1(LVI-1)w2(LVI-2)+w3(LVI-3)w4(LVI-4)+w5(LVI-5)\text{LVI} = w_1(LVI\text{-}1) - w_2(LVI\text{-}2) + w_3(LVI\text{-}3) - w_4(LVI\text{-}4) + w_5(LVI\text{-}5)

Where weights (w₁–w₅) may be adjusted by:

  • National priorities

  • Development stage

  • Regional policy objectives

The formula emphasizes that life delay and inequality subtract from overall life value, while accessibility, prevention, and sustainability enhance it.


6. Relationship to Existing UN Indicators

The LVI is designed to be SDG-compatible:

  • Uses existing UN / WHO / World Bank data sources where possible

  • Functions as a meta-evaluation layer, not a parallel reporting burden

  • Helps integrate siloed SDG metrics into a coherent life-centered narrative


7. Application Scenarios

The LVI can be applied to:

  • National policy diagnostics

  • Cross-country comparative analysis

  • AI governance impact assessment

  • Fiscal sustainability reviews

  • Early warning systems for life value erosion


8. Policy-Relevant Insight

Economic performance without life accessibility is a misleading indicator of development.

The Life Value Index enables policymakers to:

  • Detect hidden life value erosion

  • Rebalance price efficiency with life preservation

  • Strengthen preventive governance in the AI era


9. Implementation Considerations for the UN System

  • Pilot the LVI alongside SDG Voluntary National Reviews (VNRs)

  • Integrate LVI logic into AI governance and digital public infrastructure assessments

  • Use LVI trends to inform preventive investment strategies


10. Concluding Note

What is not measured cannot be governed.
What does not value life cannot sustain civilization.

The Life Value Index offers a practical, policy-ready tool to operationalize life-centered economic governance at national and international levels.